Thread: d100 does not work correctly.
-
May 4th, 2007, 22:21 #11
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 540
Originally Posted by Griogre
-
May 4th, 2007, 22:40 #12
Lesser Deity
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Arkansas
- Posts
- 7,398
Cantstanzya, I agree with you on sound and that this "bug" is very minor. However, we are talking editing some existing code rather than creating a new feature. All that is wrong here is the two dice are being added in an expession something like
dieValue = (tenTen * 10) + d10 instead of something like:
dieValue = (tenTen * 10) + (d10 % 10);
if(dieValue == 0) dieValue = 100;Last edited by Griogre; May 4th, 2007 at 22:51.
-
May 5th, 2007, 05:26 #13
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 540
Originally Posted by Griogre
-
May 5th, 2007, 08:36 #14
Lesser Deity
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Arkansas
- Posts
- 7,398
I don't feel I have to accept anything. I just write it up and let Smiteworks decide. If they don't fix it then they must be happy. If the do fix it they aren't. *shrug* I'm not going to try to second or triple guess them, that's too much like work.
-
May 5th, 2007, 13:11 #15
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Oulu, Finland
- Posts
- 287
Originally Posted by Cantstanzya
-
May 5th, 2007, 13:18 #16
In the above example, about the 0+00=100:
Call me an old timer, but this is how I am used to reading the dice in RL games. Consider that before the invention of the "10's" die, this is how you would roll d100:
First roll indicates the 10's, second roll indicates the ones. Or, if you prefer, you could roll two different colored dice and designate one color as the 10's.
It was in the 1990's that Chessex invented the 10's die, to "make things easier". Looks like it just causes confusion. LOL
So, SW is actually incorrect in the way they represent the dice, in my old skool gamer frame of mind.
So, to sum it up, it is like this:
You do NOT add the two dice together. That was never the intention. The 10's die represents what the 10's number is. For example, you may roll 90 and 1, so you get 91. If you roll 10 + 0, you get 10. If you roll 90+0, you get 90. so if you roll 00+0, then you get 100.
I think the problem is that the 1's die goes from 1 to 10. I think that this is where the confusion runs here.
From a programming point of view, I can see why SW does this, but something is not right.....
If you look at the logic, we would actually have an 11 sided die for the 10's die. This is because I see that 7+00 = 7, but 40+10 = 50. Also, the convention as to how the die are arranged changes as well.
REAL percentile dice have a 10's die ranging from 00 - 90, and the 1's die ranging from 0 - 9. This eliminates the confusion as to how the dice are read.
Can anyone remember a time BEFORE the d10, when you had to roll a special d20 marked from 1-10 twice to get your percentile roll? LOL
Cheers,
SandemanLast edited by kalmarjan; May 5th, 2007 at 13:34.
Ultimate Licence holder
I've had FG for so LONG I DON'T KNOW HOW TO USE IT!
But I'm learning!
-
May 5th, 2007, 13:34 #17
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Oulu, Finland
- Posts
- 287
Originally Posted by kalmarjan
The problem stems from *most* real 10-sided dice showing 0-9 not 1-10 so the manufacturers only have to put one figure on each face of the dice. It's perfectly logical to read 20+10 as 30, it's just not how we work when we're playing with real dice.
Edit: Hmmm I think your edit changed the entire tone of your post there.Last edited by The High Druid; May 5th, 2007 at 13:36.
-
May 5th, 2007, 13:39 #18
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Oulu, Finland
- Posts
- 287
Originally Posted by kalmarjan
-
May 5th, 2007, 18:52 #19
Now, I fully agree on how I read the dice, and long before I have had a "tens" die I always had 1 color was the tens, and the other color was the 1's (as mentioned above) with two 0's equaling a 100, etc tec. Exactly as was described by many many people on the boards here.
My question is, does it really matter how SW does it? How big an issue is it?
Logically, from a SW standpoint, it makes sense how they did it. Logically, for a gamer's standpoint, it's TOTALLY out of whack with what we're used to. Reality wise = Hit the sums button and there's no need to really care. Maybe we, as gamers, just totally screwed the pooch on how we read dice in a massive way and SW has it the correct way... even if the minority way . Either way, I don't see it as such a big deal, except for the fact that it keeps getting mentioned...
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks