1. #1

    Carry Capacity Tables for Bipeds and Quadrupeds...

    Attached is a spreadsheet with tables for all sizes of Pathfinder bipeds and quadrupeds. It also includes custom calculation fields for any STR value. It should also serve as a great gaming utility for anyone who wants to look up encumbrance values. If you see any problems with it, let me know and I will correct them.

    HoloGnome's Pathfinder Encumbrance Tables for Bipeds and Quadrupeds v1.0.0
    Last edited by HoloGnome; October 29th, 2019 at 06:24.
    FG Wish List - http://fg2app.idea.informer.com/
    License: Ultimate [Unlicensed/Free Trial FG users can play in my games]
    Teamspeak: ts.fg-con.com (alternate server in case of trouble: voice.fg-con.com)
    Password: Dungeoneers
    FG Server Alias: cold wand bold fang

  2. #2
    Kelrugem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Geneva, Switzerland, and Lyon, France
    Posts
    830
    Thank you very much

  3. #3
    Carrying Capacity is still not working properly in v3.3.9. The fix requires changes to math and also requires 2 places of precision, rather than 1. But, that being said, there is still no precision (of any kind) showing up in 3.3.9. Please check the carrying capacity precision requirements for the Pathfinder SRD (2 places) and test code against the spec before releasing. Thx!
    FG Wish List - http://fg2app.idea.informer.com/
    License: Ultimate [Unlicensed/Free Trial FG users can play in my games]
    Teamspeak: ts.fg-con.com (alternate server in case of trouble: voice.fg-con.com)
    Password: Dungeoneers
    FG Server Alias: cold wand bold fang

  4. #4
    Kelrugem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Geneva, Switzerland, and Lyon, France
    Posts
    830
    Hi

    Can you test this extension? I tried to fix this, but I didn't check the formulas (on the first sight they look okay; but I am 8 hours over my bed time so I tried to do this fast )

    I increased the precision to 2 numbers after the comma (always rounded down) and I realized that there were some cases where some numbers had two or more successive roundings involved which is likely to produce rounding errors; thence, I made sure that the rounding is done only once at the very end and not also in intermediate steps to avoid rounding errors (which hopefully resolves the wrong numbers you are still seeing)

    Also beware: The encumbrance code is only for bipeds not for quadrupeds. This means that the multiplier needed for the encumbrance definition-window for quadrupeds is not the same as described here http://www.d20srd.org/srd/carryingCapacity.htm

    I mean that the size modifiers of the weight has the ones of bipeds (like small = 3/4 and not = 1 as for quadrupeds). So, when you want to have correct values for quadrupeds then either change the size in the notes tab to Medium and then use the standard modifiers, or keep e.g. small there and then multiply the modifier given in http://www.d20srd.org/srd/carryingCapacity.htm for quadrupeds with the inverted size modifier of bipeds (inverting, to cancel the accounted modifier of bipeds), so the modifier in FG of a small quadruped would be then 4/3 = 1.333333... (when you type such periodic numbers with enough length FG should correctly calculate it). But it may be easier to keep the size of quadrupeds to medium in the notes tab then (when you change the size in the notes tab the encumbrance limits get updated but not the other size modifiers Effects with SIZE involved may be then wrong of course, then the "adjusted" modifier, "inverted biped modifier" * "quadruped modifier", is surely the better approach)
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Last edited by Kelrugem; Today at 19:58.

  5. #5
    This should already be addressed in the Test channel. So, no extension is necessary unless you can't wait for next release.

    Regards,
    JPG

  6. #6
    Kelrugem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Geneva, Switzerland, and Lyon, France
    Posts
    830
    Quote Originally Posted by Moon Wizard View Post
    This should already be addressed in the Test channel. So, no extension is necessary unless you can't wait for next release.

    Regards,
    JPG
    ah, cool, thanks a lot, I didn't think about looking into the test channel first
    Last edited by Kelrugem; Today at 17:08.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in