-
November 8th, 2020, 13:58 #51
- Join Date
- Jun 2018
- Location
- Maisons-Laffitte, France
- Posts
- 3
Great, I will try this when I get some time to
Thank for the news and notification
-
November 8th, 2020, 14:23 #52
That is normal, that is part of the creation for spells which come from modules, spaces are also used as dividers So, you can separate tags with semicolons, colons, spaces and probably other things The semicolon was just standard due to legacy of a very early save versus tags code
The reason is the following: When the parser parses tags of spells from modules, then I need to add some divider at the beginning because there could be already tags But it could also be that there are no tags yet, and then the space is the best neutral option, to avoid having a semicolon at the beginning (I could let the code check whether or not that thing is empty if that is confusing )My extensions for 3.5e and Pathfinder
Bug reports please here
-
November 8th, 2020, 14:36 #53bmos' extensions
he/them
-
November 8th, 2020, 14:53 #54My extensions for 3.5e and Pathfinder
Bug reports please here
-
November 14th, 2020, 15:19 #55
In PF1e:
The creature is also treated as one level lower for the purpose of level-dependent variables (such as spellcasting) for each negative level possessed. Spellcasters do not lose any prepared spells or slots as a result of negative levels.
NLVL: 1: CL: -1; CLC: -1Last edited by bmos; November 14th, 2020 at 15:39.
bmos' extensions
he/them
-
November 14th, 2020, 15:44 #56My extensions for 3.5e and Pathfinder
Bug reports please here
-
November 14th, 2020, 16:03 #57bmos' extensions
he/them
-
November 16th, 2020, 09:22 #58
- Join Date
- Oct 2019
- Location
- Hong Kong
- Posts
- 310
uhm, of course I could be missing something, and just jumping in between the two of you
this intrigued me, as it came up when I was messing around but have CL: -1 doesnt seem to be working for concentration checks
ie : the CC check
Screenshot 2020-11-16 172229.png
"When you make a concentration check, you roll d20 and add your caster level and the ability score modifier used to determine bonus"
this character has a WIS: 14
CL: 3
and NLVL: 1
his concentration check should be: 1d20 + 4, after effects, and in the attachment, it is not
I think what you really need to represent a negative level in pf1e is
negative level effect; NLVL: 1; CL: -1; COC: -1Last edited by Zygmunt Molotch; November 16th, 2020 at 16:32.
-
November 16th, 2020, 15:43 #59
Yes, the concentration check in PF1 is not affected I mentioned this in the last update notes:
A word about the CL effect for the PF1 users: It won't update the concentration check, please use the COC effect separetely then I decided to do so because then it is for you easy to decide whether or not bonusses to CL and concentration stack by choosing bonus types in the COC effects Otherwise I would need to add some code which checks for all COC and CL effects, and which then checks the stacking, when you roll concentration (FG's code does not check stacking of different type of effects of course) (and another problem is that the concentration does not know about tags due to that it is not spell-specific. In that way the CL is always compatible with IFTAG)My extensions for 3.5e and Pathfinder
Bug reports please here
-
November 16th, 2020, 16:32 #60
- Join Date
- Oct 2019
- Location
- Hong Kong
- Posts
- 310
perfect
good explanation!
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks