Great, I will try this when I get some time to :)
Thank for the news and notification ;)
Great, I will try this when I get some time to :)
Thank for the news and notification ;)
That is normal, that is part of the creation for spells which come from modules, spaces are also used as dividers :) So, you can separate tags with semicolons, colons, spaces and probably other things :) The semicolon was just standard due to legacy of a very early save versus tags code :)
The reason is the following: When the parser parses tags of spells from modules, then I need to add some divider at the beginning because there could be already tags :) But it could also be that there are no tags yet, and then the space is the best neutral option, to avoid having a semicolon at the beginning :D (I could let the code check whether or not that thing is empty if that is confusing :) )
In PF1e:
Not sure about 3.5E, but now you can automate NLVL fully thanks to the new update :)Quote:
The creature is also treated as one level lower for the purpose of level-dependent variables (such as spellcasting) for each negative level possessed. Spellcasters do not lose any prepared spells or slots as a result of negative levels.
NLVL: 1: CL: -1; CLC: -1
uhm, of course I could be missing something, and just jumping in between the two of you :D
this intrigued me, as it came up when I was messing around but have CL: -1 doesnt seem to be working for concentration checks
ie : the CC check
Attachment 41173
"When you make a concentration check, you roll d20 and add your caster level and the ability score modifier used to determine bonus"
this character has a WIS: 14
CL: 3
and NLVL: 1
his concentration check should be: 1d20 + 4, after effects, and in the attachment, it is not
I think what you really need to represent a negative level in pf1e is
.. let me know if i'm wrong :DQuote:
negative level effect; NLVL: 1; CL: -1; COC: -1
Yes, the concentration check in PF1 is not affected :) I mentioned this in the last update notes:
So, yes, for PF1 one needs to add COC, for 3.5e one does not need to add anything :) (in my answer to bmos I did not think about that it was about PF1 :D)Quote:
A word about the CL effect for the PF1 users: It won't update the concentration check, please use the COC effect separetely then :) I decided to do so because then it is for you easy to decide whether or not bonusses to CL and concentration stack by choosing bonus types in the COC effects :) Otherwise I would need to add some code which checks for all COC and CL effects, and which then checks the stacking, when you roll concentration (FG's code does not check stacking of different type of effects of course) :D (and another problem is that the concentration does not know about tags due to that it is not spell-specific. In that way the CL is always compatible with IFTAG)
perfect :)
good explanation!