Adding and Linking Attributes to the Combat Tracker

#2 partially solved, buttons added to CT

FG Code:

Code:

---

            <button_ct_section_defense name="button_section_defense" merge="join" insertbefore="button_section_space">
                <anchored>
                    <right parent="rightanchor" offset="0" relation="relative" />
                </anchored>
            </button_ct_section_defense>
            <button_ct_section_active name="button_section_active" merge="join" insertbefore="button_section_space">
                <anchored>
                    <right parent="rightanchor" offset="0" relation="relative" />
                </anchored>
            </button_ct_section_active>

---

RSW Actions:
- Create FG Button
- Name button
- Remove Font and Frame
- Add custom Anchoring: anchor=right, offset=0, parent=rightanchor, relation=relative
- set insertbefore=button_section_space
Attachment 66735

You shouldn't need the "anchored" overrides; since the default templates already do that. (buttoncontrol -> button_ct_section (sets anchored) -> button_ct_section_defense)

Regards,
JPG

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Moon Wizard

You shouldn't need the "anchored" overrides; since the default templates already do that. (buttoncontrol -> button_ct_section (sets anchored) -> button_ct_section_defense)

Regards,
JPG

---

Thanks. That's a limitation of my knowledge of RSW, If I remove the anchor then RSW inserts Bounds. Which then cause problems :)

Sounds like something to take up with psicodelix. Seems like bounds should not be forced on an existing template; especially since it's anchored.

JPG

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Moon Wizard

Sounds like something to take up with psicodelix. Seems like bounds should not be forced on an existing template; especially since it's anchored.

JPG

---

It might be just that I don't know how to do it properly or could be a limitation. From my understanding, RSW needs Bounds values unless the control is explicitly anchored in RSW. So that's why I add the anchor tags. Even after all this time, I consider myself pretty green :)

The anchored tags are already part of the standard templates for the ct_entry stuff. If you're using all the same templates; you shouldn't need them.
See 5E ruleset : ct_host_entry.xml ; windowclass name="ct_entry". It doesn't need those tags; so not sure why you would even with RSW unless you are editing the ct_entry manually and moving stuff.

Regards,
JPG